News & Blog

Go to Article

At the turn of the millennium, the retail industry was aglow with technological and opera­tional possibilities.

The internet was seen as a platform for both selling things and making merchandising and fulfillment processes more ef­ficient. Data processing power and storage capacity was grow­ing dramatically, an improve­ment that cut analysis time from weeks down to hours. Ad­ditionally, data communication speeds were accelerating so quickly that frontline associates now had access to nearly real­time insights.

These were heady times for retailers and suppliers – two segments that had previously been considered well behind the technology curve across most operations, with the pos­sible exceptions of point-of-sale and ordering. Out of this mael­strom, Transora, GlobalNet­Xchange, World Wide Retail Ex­change and dozens of smaller consortium trading exchanges (CTEs) emerged – and each one promised to revolutionize every facet of the way retailers and suppliers worked together.

Within months of the launches Within months of the launches of the three large exchanges, analysts at Gartner predicted that only 20% of the CTEs would survive industry consoli­dation by 2004. They were off by 20%, as Transora, Global­NetXchange and World Wide Retail Exchange all failed. Only a few of the smaller, commod­ity-based exchanges lasted more than five years.
What happened in paradise? According to analysts, most exchange operators were too optimistic about delivery dates for functionality; they lacked consensus about where the functionality should reside; there was poor budgeting; and none offered marketplace-to-­marketplace integration. While supplier recruitment, participation and integration issues were also taking their toll, most importantly, these marketplac­es were riddled with significant political infighting among par­ticipating companies (i.e., who should control the project?), and trading partners (i.e., who should get the biggest slice of any savings?).

Sidetracked by these chal­lenges, not one company even considered what would become retail’s greatest disruptor since Walmart’s entry nearly half a century ago: an emerging com­pany called Amazon.com.

At the turn of the century, Am­azon still hadn’t posted a quar­terly profit. Its impressive debut as a books and music retailer gained the attention of both business and investment ana­lysts, both of which considered the company a bellwether for e­commerce. However, the online retailer’s stock price had a case of the doldrums, and wouldn’t really start to take off until after the Great Recession. Prime was still a decade away, and its first foray into food was six years off.

While 17 years is more than a lifetime in the tech world, as well as for the systems that support retailers, wholesalers and brands, companies’ sys­tems have come a long way. And oftentimes these efforts are driven by the fast pace dic­tated by Amazon.

To keep up with their online competitor, trading partners are working harder to under­stand what data is imperative to engage their shoppers, their optimal products assortment, and what technology solutions can boost the efficiency of their operations. Similarly, technolo­gy providers have also matured their thinking, and built out so­lutions that serve the goals of the trading partners.

Other variables are in play too, like retailers’ generational shift to more tech-savvy workers and changing corporate cultures re­sulting from mobile computing and similar trends, issues that are prompting companies to adopt faster, better and smarter solutions if they want to com­pete with Amazon going for­ward. This also requires more attention on the extended retail supply chain, an operation that needs to be more efficient, get products on the shelf faster and keep those products in stock so shoppers can buy them.

Yet, there is plenty of work to be done.

Even with all the new tech­nology deployed by retailers, they still lag behind Amazon in terms of shopper engagement and inventory optimization. Too often, retailers lose customers to Amazon not because of the online retailer’s lower prices, but because they can’t coordi­nate inventory with shopper demand. Rarely do Amazon shoppers compare or check prices.

The Amazon advantage, which is often characterized as price or convenience, is likely just “predictability.” How often, you might ask yourself, does Amazon tell you it can’t provide the item you want because it is out of stock? Compare that to the 10% to 15% out-of-stock items in most retail stores. This out-of-stock issue is now bub­bling up in home delivery, as well. Ask Millennial children, likely users of Instacart and similar services, how often after placing an order they have to approve a substitution? The an­swer will be far too often. What if the truth of the matter is that price shoppers are a smaller mi­nority of customers and since satisfying them is impossible, the better strategy is to focus on being in stock to satisfy your core customers?

Brands need to constantly develop new tools, especially those that give them better in­sight into customer demand and inventory management, to keep up with Amazon. This is not an easy task when com­peting with a company that spends billions of dollars on re­search and development annu­ally. In fact, the company spent $17.4 billion on R&D over the 12 months ended in March 2017, according to Bloomberg View.

So how can retailers ever leap­frog Amazon?

Retailers need to adopt the next generation of trading plat­forms – complex, yet flexible computing technology that is found in the cloud. This agile technology combines product discovery, comprehensive sup­plier relationships and shopper demand realization, yet still connects the plumbing of the retail supply chain.

These new trading platforms enable companies to search for suppliers that meet select crite­ria, like regulatory compliance and certifications, in an effort to bring new products to mar­ket in just a fraction of the time. Unlike their electronic supplier catalog predecessors, these new systems also automate and guide the sourcing process from end to end, across sup­plier qualification, order nego­tiation and on-boarding of new suppliers.

This next generation of plat­forms also help trading partners reduce pricing errors, enhance invoice reconciliation and dra­matically cut out-of-stocks and overstocks. The technology also will reduce the time category managers spend on discovery, compliance and supply chain management issues, enabling users to focus more on custom­er service activities, like digital outreach, shopper loyalty pro­grams and in-store promotions.

Perhaps most importantly, new trading platforms feature centralized curation of prod­ucts and guardrails for order quantities. This national-level protection and local ordering functionality is really the best of both worlds, and can help cre­ate a dramatic competitive ad­vantage – one that helps them better compete with Amazon.

A good example of the indi­viduation that trading plat­forms provide can be seen with merchandise marketed by spe­cific sports teams. Retailers want to ensure that individual stores can order shirts, banners and caps of local, professional, college and even high school sports teams. Yet, they also want to have control over order­ing, so they aren’t stuck with unsellable inventory. The same goes for hot new craft products. Retailers need this merchan­dise because they want to of­fer shoppers something that isn’t available at Amazon, but brands also need to limit their product inventory risk.

Meanwhile, these new trad­ing platforms help retailers keep required compliance stan­dards. This capability is increas­ingly important as retailers offer more “local,” new or smaller brands. While lucrative, these companies have the potential of exponentially increasing risk for retailers, as undercapitalized suppliers are less likely to apply and maintain good – and safe – manufacturing practices. Be­sides saving companies weeks of research, standardization also helps retailers replace non­compliant suppliers, a practice that is expected to increase as validation demands across cat­egories, including organics and non-GMOs, are raised.

The exchanges of the early 2000’s are long gone because of their systemic disconnect between the old way of doing business and the proposed new way. They won’t be back.

New trading platform technol­ogies hold much more promise and have considerably less risk for retailers and brands. These systems take into account, and try to capitalize on, capabili­ties like cloud computing and big data that weren’t around 17 years ago. In doing so, these emerging solutions deliver on the original promises of the ex­changes. The key point is that only a comprehensive trading platform can offset the advan­tage Amazon now has over tra­ditional retailers.

Randy Fields is chairman and chief executive officer of Park City Group, a cloud-based soft­ware company that uses big data management to help retail­ers and their suppliers sell more, stock less and see everything. Fields is a cofounder of Reposi­Trak, a cloud-based solution that enables all participants in the farm-to-table supply chain to easily manage records and regulatory compliance. Fields can be reached at randy@ parkcitygroup.com.